Revelation (The book of)

The book of Revelation has been an enigma to me since I first became a Christian in 1972. I was never able to understand it. I once taught an adult class on the book of Revelation but taught it from a book I was reading at the time. My reason for teaching the class was that I thought that we should be able to understand Revelation. After teaching this group I was still no closer to understanding it than I was before I started teaching.

Up until 2004 I read Revelation in my reading schedule, but read it out of obligation to the schedule rather than to understand it.

I am not claiming that now, by some miraculous intervention, I understand Revelation. What I am saying is that maybe I have been looking at Revelation from the wrong perspective. Praise God for his understanding and patience.

Important note!
This is not a comparison of the many different opinions of Revelation. It is, however my opinion on how I believe Revelation fits into a different time frame than I originally thought. I hope that for some, it will take away some of the myths and fables that have grown up around Revelation through the years. It may even serve as a launch pad for your own review of the Revelation of Jesus Christ. I certainly hope so.

Please read the Scriptures quoted and check the ones I type. Read them in context, not just a verse or two before and after but until you are sure you understand the context. The ideal is to read the whole book or letter for context but this is not always possible. Please don't assume that you know what the verse says without reading it. I believe one way of reading context is to ask “What did the original reader understand from what was written”.

It’s my opinion that the Revelation of Jesus Christ was written for a period contained within the lifetime of the Apostles. Chapter 1:4 tells us to whom it is written. “To the seven churches in the province of Asia:” In chapter 22:16 nothing has changed; “I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning star.”

I believe that alone should convince us when it was written and to whom.

Another reason I think the Revelation was written for the time of the disciples is contained in the book of Daniel.

Daniel is a prophetic book. In Daniel 8:1 - 14 we read a prophecy. In Daniel 8:15 – 27 we are told what that prophecy means. History tells us that the fulfilment of that prophecy occurred some 200 years after Daniel wrote it. The messenger, Gabriel says in Daniel 8:26; “The visions of the evenings and the mornings that has been given you is true, but seal up the vision, for it concerns the distant future.”

Daniel was told to seal up the vision because it concerned the distant future. We now know that it was about 200 years distant.

Revelation 22:10 “Then he told me, ‘”Do not seal up the words of the prophecy of this book, because the time is near…”’ (underline mine TP)

If Daniel had to seal up the prophecy because it concerned the distant future, and we know this to be approximately 200 years. How long would the “…time is near…” be?

John was told not to seal up the prophecy because the time was near.

I stated earlier that we should ask; “What did the original reader understand from what was written”?

It’s important to read scripture in this way because the originals were written to people living in the 1^st century. I understand that we like to apply some principles to us in the 21^st century but primarily the message was written to the early church not to us in the 21st century.

What would the 1^st century reader have understood John to be saying when he wrote John 11:29; “When Mary heard this, she got up quickly and went to him.”

The word “quickly” implies that it didn’t take Mary very long to respond to Martha’s (Vs 23-28) statement that “The Teacher is here”. The scripture says that she “got up quickly”.

The same word is used in the “Revelation” and I don’t believe that it changes its meaning.

This message is to the Church in Pergamum. Revelation 2:16 “Repent therefore! Otherwise, I will soon come to you…” I believe that the church in Pergamum understood that if they did not repent then Jesus would “soon come”. “Soon” meaning shortly or quickly.

Revelation 3:11 was written to the church in Philadelphia “I am coming soon…” Did the Philadelphia congregation understand Jesus to be “coming soon” or in the year 2006 or later?

It might be argued that Jesus was indeed coming to the seven churches in the first three chapters of Revelation and later he is speaking of the future.

Is that possible? I don’t think so.

Revelation 4:1b “…’Come up here, and I will show you what must take place after this’.”

John is told by “a voice” that some things were going to take place after the letters to the churches.

The question is How far into the future is “after this”?

Let’s let the bible answer.

Revelation 11:14 “The second woe has past; the third woe is coming soon.” What would the readers of the revelation understand by “the third woe is coming soon”? I believe that they would have been expecting the third woe to be coming shortly.

The next time we see this word which means “Quickly” is in Revelation 22 where it is used three times.

Rev. 22:7 reads: “Behold I am coming soon! Blessed is he who keeps the words of the prophecy in this book.”

Vs 12 reads “Behold, I am coming soon! My reward is with me, and I will give to everyone according to what he has done.”

Vs 20 reads “He who testifies to these things says, “’Yes, I am coming soon.’ Amen. Come Lord Jesus.’”

These passages make it clear that Jesus intended to return “soon”, not some unspecified time in the future.

All the things written in the book of Revelation would come to pass before or around the time of the destruction of Jerusalem.
How can I be so sure? It makes sense, if you read the Revelation of Jesus Christ from beginning to end without stopping. And if you read the Revelation of Jesus Christ with a different mindset, that is, that instead of thinking of Revelation being future, (Our future) think of it as already in our past, but in their near future
But, I hear some people saying. "You're telling people to have a bias." No, I'm telling people to look at the revelation from another point of view. A bias always leans to one side. If you have 2 bias' to look at then there is balance.

When you read about the new heaven and the new earth, try to look at it as if we are living in Eden, because we are now reconciled to God. Just like Adam was originally.

When you read of the New Jerusalem coming down out of heaven in Chapter 21 and being adorned as a bride is dressed for her husband. Think of the fact that the church is the bride of Christ. Revelation 21:9, 10, says that John was shown “the bride, the wife of the Lamb…and (he) showed me the Holy City, Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God.”

Try not to think of the “harvest” as being the judgement of all humankind but of those who saw the destruction of Jerusalem.

Try to get away from thinking that Revelation is about the last days of the earth but rather think of it as judgement on or the last days of Jerusalem or Israel. Read Luke 21:20 – 24.